Permanent residency: revocation for deliberate non-payment of taxes and contributions

From 1 April 2027, permanent residency can be revoked if the holder deliberately fails to pay taxes or social insurance contributions, breaches duties under the Immigration Control Act, or is sentenced to imprisonment for certain crimes. In most cases the person is moved to another residence status rather than removed. Guidelines published on 1 October 2026 set out how the grounds will be applied.

Status
Coming up
Effective
1 April 2027
Decided
21 June 2024
Type
Statute amendment
Applies to
Permanent residents, and the employers that withhold their taxes and social insurance

What changes

The 2024 amendment to the Immigration Control Act (Act No. 60 of 2024, promulgated 21 June 2024) adds two grounds for revoking permanent residency to Article 22-4, in force on 1 April 2027. The first covers a permanent resident who fails to meet obligations under the Act, such as reporting duties, or who deliberately does not pay taxes and public dues, including social insurance contributions. The second covers a sentence of imprisonment for specified offences, such as theft, fraud and assault.

The amendment also writes compliance with the Act and payment of taxes and contributions into the conditions for granting permanent residency. Where revocation is on the new grounds, the Minister of Justice must, unless continued residence is inappropriate, grant another residence status instead. Public officials may report cases they come across.

The government has said that inadvertent or short delays, or genuine inability to pay, should not lead to revocation, and the Act directs the authorities to consider the person's payment history and circumstances.

On 1 October 2026 the Immigration Services Agency published Guidelines on the Revocation of Permanent Resident Status, which it will start applying on 1 April 2027. "Deliberate" non-payment means it is clear the person has no intention of paying, judged on income, assets, the number, amount and length of arrears, and how they responded to demands. Examples include long arrears combined with moving without notifying the municipality, ignoring repeated demands, repeatedly breaking an instalment plan, and conviction for tax evasion. Inability to pay because of illness, disaster or job loss, agreed instalment plans, and cases where the employer deducted taxes or contributions from pay but did not pass them on are given as examples that do not qualify. There is no fixed arrears threshold. A permanent resident who runs or controls a company can be caught if they knowingly leave the company's taxes or contributions unpaid. Non-payment before April 2027 that comes to light later can also count, although the guidelines say the later payment record will be considered.

For breaches of duties under the Act, the guidelines say a single lapse, such as forgetting to carry the residence card or to renew it on time, is not expected to lead to revocation on its own.

Who it applies to

All of the roughly 947,000 permanent residents in Japan. Employers matter because most employees pay income tax, inhabitant tax and social insurance through payroll.

Action for employers

Sources

General information for employers, not legal advice. Dates and thresholds are checked against the sources listed and dated above; confirm anything you act on with a Japanese employment lawyer or a licensed labour and social security attorney.