Part-time, fixed-term and dispatched workers: new statement on the right to an explanation, and revised equal-pay guidelines

From 1 October 2026, written terms given to part-time, fixed-term and dispatched workers on hiring must state that they can ask for an explanation of how and why their treatment differs from regular staff. The equal-pay guidelines, revised on 28 April 2026, add retirement allowances, family and housing allowances and other items.

Status
In force
Effective
1 October 2026
Decided
28 April 2026
Type
Ordinance or notice
Applies to
Employers of part-time and fixed-term staff, and agencies and clients using dispatched workers

What changes

A ministerial ordinance and two guideline notices promulgated on 28 April 2026 took effect on 1 October 2026.

First, the written statement of terms on hiring must now say that the worker can ask the employer to explain the content of, and reasons for, any difference in treatment compared with regular employees. For part-time and fixed-term workers this is added to the existing list of items (pay rises, bonuses, retirement allowances, and who to consult). For dispatched workers, the agency must include it both when it hires the worker, including on renewal, and when it dispatches them.

Second, the equal-pay guidelines, which say when a difference in treatment is unreasonable, were revised in light of recent court rulings. Retirement allowances get their own section, and the guidelines now also address no-accident allowances, family allowances, housing allowances, summer and winter holidays and long-service awards, with more detail on bonuses and paid sick leave. A parallel revision to the employment management guideline encourages pay improvements based on fair evaluation.

The underlying statutes have not changed. The right to an explanation has existed since 2020; what is new is that workers must be told about it in writing.

Who it applies to

Any employer with part-time or fixed-term staff, including re-employed retirees and contract specialists. For dispatch, the agency carries the statement duty; the client should expect agencies to ask for more information on its own staff's pay.

Action for employers

Sources

General information for employers, not legal advice. Dates and thresholds are checked against the sources listed and dated above; confirm anything you act on with a Japanese employment lawyer or a licensed labour and social security attorney.