Labour Contract Act 労働契約法

The 2007 statute that codified Japan's case law on dismissal, transfer and changes to terms. Also written rodo keiyaku ho, rōdō keiyaku hō, Labor Contract Act, LCA.

For most of the postwar period, the rules that decided the hardest employment questions in Japan were not in any statute. Whether a dismissal was valid, whether a transfer order had to be obeyed, whether work rules could be changed to employees' disadvantage: all of this was judge-made law, built up case by case from the 1950s onwards. The Labour Contract Act, passed in 2007 and in force from March 2008, wrote much of that case law into a short statute.

It is a different kind of law from the Labour Standards Act. It sets no minimum standards, carries no criminal penalties and has no inspectorate. It is civil law, enforced when an employee sues or goes to the labour tribunal. Its key provisions are the employer's duty to consider employees' safety (Article 5), the rules on when work rules form part of the contract and when they can be changed (Articles 7 to 10), the limits on secondment, discipline and dismissal as abuses of right (Articles 14 to 16), and the restriction on dismissing fixed-term employees before their term ends (Article 17).

A 2012 amendment added the two rules on fixed-term contracts that matter most in practice: conversion to an open-ended contract after five years (Article 18) and the codified protection against non-renewal (Article 19). A third rule from that amendment, on unreasonable differences in treatment for fixed-term staff, was moved in 2020 into the Part-Time and Fixed-Term Employment Act.

What it means for a foreign employer

Sources

Spotted something wrong, or have an example from your own hiring in Japan? Suggest an edit.

General information for employers, not legal advice. Thresholds and dates are checked against the sources listed and dated above; confirm anything you act on with a Japanese employment lawyer or a licensed labour and social security attorney.