Job-based employment ジョブ型雇用

Hiring and paying people for a defined job, rather than for membership of the company. Also written job-gata koyo, job-type employment, job-based HR.

The labour scholar Keiichiro Hamaguchi popularised the contrast between two models. In membership-type employment, a company hires people rather than filling jobs, then assigns and reassigns them as it sees fit. Pay follows the person's grade, built up through ability and tenure. In job-type employment, the company defines the role, hires someone to do it and pays according to the role's size and the market. Most of the world works the second way. Large Japanese companies have traditionally worked the first.

Since around 2020 several have moved. Hitachi wrote job descriptions for almost all its employees and set out to complete the shift. Fujitsu introduced job-based grading for around 15,000 managers in April 2020 and then moved to extend it to other staff. KDDI moved to a job-based system from 2020, ending a uniform starting salary for graduates. Shiseido is another widely cited case. The government has backed the trend: the Cabinet Secretariat, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and the labour ministry jointly published Job-Based HR Guidelines in August 2024, with case studies from 20 companies.

Concede the shift is real, then note its limits. Most Japanese versions are hybrids, often applied to managers first. And the law has not changed: if a job disappears, the employer still has to look for another role before dismissal can be justified.

What it means for a foreign employer

Sources

Spotted something wrong, or have an example from your own hiring in Japan? Suggest an edit.

General information for employers, not legal advice. Thresholds and dates are checked against the sources listed and dated above; confirm anything you act on with a Japanese employment lawyer or a licensed labour and social security attorney.